
― Product discovery for a GIS and AI property marketplace concept
Property listings show price, photos, and short location notes. Buyers still need separate map tools and local research to understand access, surroundings, and spatial context. GeoProperty explored a listing experience that combined property promotion with GIS context and AI-assisted information.
| Field | Record |
|---|---|
| Role | Associate product manager intern |
| Period | December 2023 to March 2024 |
| Organization | Nerdvana Hub |
| Delivery model | Three workstreams across design, engineering, and content |
The team examined the gap between listing information and location understanding. Buyers had to leave a listing to inspect nearby services, routes, and area context. Sellers also needed a stronger way to explain the setting around a property.
I owned product discovery and planning. I conducted user interviews, reviewed competitors, shaped the business plan, prioritized features, and built the roadmap. I coordinated design, engineering, and content work through sprint priorities and requirement handoffs.
The internship ended after discovery, planning, and team handoff. I did not retain launch, transaction, or buyer-conversion data.
I translated interview and market findings into requirements for three connected workstreams. Design handled the listing and map journey. Engineering handled the web and GIS behavior. Content defined the property and area information that users would read.
I placed the listing and location journey at the center of the scope. AI and panorama ideas supported that journey. They did not replace the need for clear property facts and map context.
I handed the team a business plan, product roadmap, prioritized requirements, and direction for design, engineering, and content. The package connected interview findings and competitor gaps to work the team could schedule.
The former repository URL no longer resolves. I kept the product image on this page and removed the dead code link.
I no longer have the interview count, usability results, or a release report. Those gaps rule out adoption and commercial claims. I would rebuild this case around the original research notes, prototype, and team outcome data if the team recovers them.